Reasonable Deconstruction with Unoriginal Jim

Recognizing special pleading and identity protection in our religious and political ideas.

How a 30 minutes chat with a member of bad religion helped me understand that questions and doubt were not problematic. But signs of growth. 

In a meme that popped up on my social media page a right wing activist questioned the creation of West Virginia during the Civil War and used a historically illiterate argument to feed false narratives that the Civil War really wasn’t about slavery at all.

 It’s all the hype that your money can buy
All the hype and press releases from Noah’s arc scans uses language of certainty to beg for donations. They are conning people.

despite the conference speech against gambling. The church fully endorses another more lucrative asymmetric financial dynamic. One in which the church always gets its money and the member always gets speculative vague promises in return. 

I came across a video from Tanner Yost directed at people who have left the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It's a very emotional appeal, filmed in front of an LDS temple with somber music and a message that those who have left have rejected the "most true church" and need to return and be "healed." I want to respond to that message, but also to the way the message is constructed, because there's an important difference between making an argument for why someone should believe something and emotionally framing disagreement as evidence that something is wrong with the person who disagrees.